Armenian CC Chairman, Member of House of Lords discuss judicial reforms in Armenia
14.09.2007,
00:02
Chairman of the RA Court of Cassation Hovhannes Manukyan and the member of the House of Lords, British Parliament, John McCluskie discussed judicial reforms in Armenia.
YEREVAN, September 13. /.ARKA/. Chairman of the RA Court of Cassation Hovhannes Manukyan and the member of the House of Lords, British Parliament, John McCluskie discussed judicial reforms in Armenia.
Press Secretary of the RA Court of Cassation Alina Yegoyan reported that during the meeting Manukyan informed the British parliamentarian of the process of reforms in Armenia, particularly of the judicial reforms launched after the constitutional referendum on 2005.
Manukyan pointed out that the Armenian Court of Cassation is currently facing a number of new problems, particularly the formation of the institute of case law and greater transparency of the judicial system.
The sides discussed the specific features of the second stage of reforms and the formation of a new judicial system.
On his turn, John McCluskie made a number of positive professional assessments. In this context, he laid emphasis on the institution of case law in Armenia.
The British parliamentarian expressed his willingness to help his Armenian counterparts invite British judges to Armenia for them to share their experience with Armenian judges. P.T. –0--
Press Secretary of the RA Court of Cassation Alina Yegoyan reported that during the meeting Manukyan informed the British parliamentarian of the process of reforms in Armenia, particularly of the judicial reforms launched after the constitutional referendum on 2005.
Manukyan pointed out that the Armenian Court of Cassation is currently facing a number of new problems, particularly the formation of the institute of case law and greater transparency of the judicial system.
The sides discussed the specific features of the second stage of reforms and the formation of a new judicial system.
On his turn, John McCluskie made a number of positive professional assessments. In this context, he laid emphasis on the institution of case law in Armenia.
The British parliamentarian expressed his willingness to help his Armenian counterparts invite British judges to Armenia for them to share their experience with Armenian judges. P.T. –0--
